Artificial intelligence. Human consequences.Independent perspectives · English edition
AI Affect.
The publication

Editorial standards

Start with a useful question

We explain AI through its consequences for people. We prefer concrete examples over sensational predictions. An explainer should help readers understand a distinction or make a better-informed decision.

Make the evidence inspectable

We prioritize original research, public institutions and official technical documentation. Article source lists describe the scope of the evidence. A laboratory result is not automatically a real-world outcome; occupational exposure is not a count of jobs lost.

Separate findings and interpretation

We identify study settings and dates where material. Practical frameworks are our synthesis. Future scenarios are possibilities, not promises. We do not claim certainty about AGI timelines or guaranteed income from AI.

AI assistance

The initial collection uses AI-assisted research organization and drafting. Links allow readers to inspect the underlying material. We do not claim that AI assistance provides independent verification, human editorial review or original reporting.

Corrections and updates

Send the article URL, disputed passage and supporting source through our contact page. Material factual corrections will be dated and described on the affected article when made. Publication dates describe the article, not the age of every cited study.

Commercial independence

No advertisements, paid placements or affiliate relationships are active in this version. If introduced, commercial placements will be labeled. Payment will not be presented as independent evidence or an editorial endorsement.